12/01 Native Guard Response

December 1st, 2010

“You can get there from here, though/ there’s no going home./ Everywhere you go will be somewhere/ you’ve never been. Try this:/ head South on Mississippi 49…”

I chose this excerpt because I found it to be good example of  a constant theme for both Kincaid and Trethewey: that of denying where home is, and then contradicting themselves deliberately. Here we see that Trethewey feels that there is no getting home, there’s just “here” and “there”, and yet the first location she uses as an example is Mississippi, where she was born. If there is no such thing as “home”, she could have very easily said “Ohio”, or some distant-sounding place like Tulsa, Oklahoma. Instead she chose Mississippi, indicating that her parting point could be none other than her origin, and isn’t that “home”?

Kincaid goes through the same denying process by referring to Antigua as a small place, and Antiguans as “they”. Yet to emphasize the consequences of colonization her main focus is Antigua, not a cluster of small Caribbean Islands, or whole continents (i.e. South America). She is telling us directly that her sole concern is Antigua, and indirectly that Antigua matters to her. I would attribute this interest to the fact that she is Antiguan, and that Antigua is her home.

They both use place as a way of reflecting their attitudes toward their origins and also to exemplify how distance, actual or temporal, transformed their identities. It’s true, there’s always a “here” and ‘there” and a long walk in between, these authors thrive on this to give us useful information about themselves, where they come from as opposed to where they are. Inevitably, they become home-denying as their identities morph under the influence of other places, nonetheless, their books reflect that they are ultimately home-bound.

11/10 Fun Home Response

November 9th, 2010

I believe that what Julia Watson is suggesting in“Autographic Disclosures and Genealogies of Desire in Alison Bechdel’s Fun Home” is that visual and verbal representations  are equally as valid and important in representing the “self” as verbal representation alone. The cartoonish approach of Fun Home invites the reader to read differently by combining visual and lexical choices, which require as much attention as any other conventional approach. Watson argues that:

“At the same time it (Autographics) is intertextual, incorporating a wealth of Modernist literary references into comics that turns the form into a forum on the multi-textual pastiche of contemporary culture.”

“Autographics” is then defended as the natural response to modern culture, and its comic phenotype should not be simply regarded as comical,  it is still an auto/biography (that may or may not be a funny read).

I agree with Watson’s argument that cartoon representation enhances verbal representation, though I expected to laugh a little more than I did. The biggest challenge in accepting Autographics as a serious form of autobiography is that it employs the element of cartoons, and I can’t help but think of “Tom and Jerry” when I hear the word. Anyways, I enjoyed seeing as I was reading, instead of imagining faces and places like most books require.

11/3 The Kiss Response

November 9th, 2010

“… these nowheres and notimes are the only home we have.”

Indeed, The Kiss is a book that is hard to relate to for its dealings with incest- I had to put it down several times though it can be read in a day-  until I decided to focus on other themes, such as that of undergoing a loss. Phrases like the one stated above allowed me to bypass the crudeness of the primary content and focus on what perhaps others find unimportant, but I found relatable. I will say then that Harrison was lost, that her father was not a “guardian angel” but the object of her loss, and that we can all relate to that. Replace the father with a deep personal loss, perhaps that of a home, a job, a lover, a pet, a time in our lives, and imagine that you can journey back to it, that is how The Kiss becomes relatable.

Of course, most of us will not have taken the same route back, Harrison slept with her loss and well we know what happened after… but we all long to get back what we lose and seems untimely. Forging romantic ideas, looking for second chances, our journey begins much like Harrison’s, only that romantic for her turned into romance, and her second chance was more like a recipe for emotional disaster. I will not hate her for it, but make no mistake, even if I could I would not be her friend.

10/27 To Bedlam and Part Way Back Response

October 27th, 2010

When reading To Bedlam and Part Way Back, I noticed that one of Sexton’s repeating theme was the imagery of children, which she often used to establish similitudes between adults and children. From the very first poem “You, Doctor Martin” she says “what large children we are”, clearly implying that adults are children at a larger scale; in “Torn down from Glory Daily” we read that: “now, like children, we climb down humps of rock”, again, adults are compared to children. However, many times we are made aware of the child, or children, that appear(s)in solitary, briefly in a verse or two, not to be seen again in the poem. This “children in the background effect” is present in “The Kite”, “The Road Back”, “The Portrait of an old Woman…”, “Funnel”, among others. Furthermore, Sexton’s imagery of children also goes beyond the ornamental background piece, she also uses children as protagonists in poems like “The Bells”, “For Johhny Pole On the Forgotten Beach”, and “Unknown Girl in the Maternity Ward”.

Why? I believe there is a good psychoanalytical explanation for this so I will leave that to the experts. As a reader, I think, this imagery of children calls for an awareness of life’s many stages; defends purity amidst the stains of addiction and mental illness; enforces the true beginning of life’s journey- and so on. By doing so, Sexton suggests that either we are never fully grown, or that growth is irreversible and the object of inner melancholy.

10/24 Prospectus and Annotated Bibliography

October 25th, 2010

Diana Sanchez

Prof. Pamela Burger

English 391W

10/24/2010

Prospectus

In my research paper I will be looking into Anne Sexton’s Bedlam and Part Way Back poems, especially those who best evidence the fragmented an out-looking self. The criticism surrounding Anne Sexton’s work focuses on the exclusive nature of her secluded “I”- often repudiated for its grotesque content. I will argue to the contrary, that the fragmented self present in Anne Sexton’s poems is not grotesque- that it deals with the obscene but that it is not obscene. I will argue that through the process of revision Sexton’s poems were part of a careful craft- that there is no relationship between the fragmented self and a fragmented mind as many critics seem to believe. Furthermore, I will briefly cite other works of confessional poets like W.D. Snodgrass and Sylvia Plath in order to link the concept of the fragmented self to the stylistic preferences of the confessional poetry genre.

First, I will explain what the fragmented self is by using Linda Anderson’s Autobiography. In order to evidence the fragmented self in Anne Sexton’s Bedlam and Part Way Back, I will utilize the following three poems: Music Swims Back to Me, The Kite, and Her Kind. I will use the words of critics like James Dickey and Hayden Carruth, who judged Sexton more on content than on form. To counterpart their arguments, I will bring in critics like Beverly Fields and Mona Van Duyn, who argued that the “I” was a character separate from the author. Furthermore, I will use excerpts from W.D. Snodgrass’ Heart’s Needle and Sylvia Plath’s Ariel in order to expose the fragmented and out-looking self as a stylistic choice of confessional poets.

Annotated Bibliography

Anderson, Linda. Autobiography. New York: Routledge, 2001. Print.

Autobiography is a compilation of literary criticism surrounding the genre of autobiography. It looks at the works of several autobiographical authors  as well as the literary criticism produced by these works. This book will help me distinguish critical from psychoanalytical arguments by defining what constitutes literary criticism.

Ed. Carolyn Riley and Barbara Harte. “Contemporary Literary Criticism.” Gale Research 2 (1974): 390-392. Web. 24 Oct. 2010.

Ed. Jeffrey W. Hunter and Polly Vedder. “Contemporary Literary Criticism.” Gale Research 123 (2000): 400-454. Web. 24 Oct. 2010.

Ed. Joseph Mark Conte. “American Poets Since World War II, Fifth Series.” Dictionary of Literary Biography 169 (1996): 244-252. Web. 24 Oct. 2010.

Derived from Literary Criticism Online, an overview of selected literary genres and the critical reception of works. “Contemporary Literary Criticism”  and “ American Poets Since World War II, Fifth Series” provide well-researched information on the biography of Anne Sexton as well as the literary critics that revised her works. These sources will help me understand the critical debates surrounding Sexton’s work and render which one supports and/or rebuts my argument.

Plath, Sylvia. Ariel, the Restored Edition. New York:  HarperCollins Publishers, 2004. Print.

Book written by confessional poet Sylvia Plath. Critically linked to the works of Anne Sexton for its similar themes and motifs. Plath deals with depression and thoughts of suicide, as well as feminist topics such as female sexuality, empowerment, etc. This source will help me find stylistic similarities between Plath and Sexton, mainly focusing on the concept of the fragmented self and how it is preferred by confessional poets over the unified self.

Snodgrass, W.D. Heart’s Needle. Michigan: Knopf, 1959. Print.

Collection of poems by W.D. Snodgrass, first published in 1959. Known as one of the most influential collection of confessional poetry by critics and other confessional poets like Anne Sexton and Sylvia Plath. Critically acclaimed as “revolutionary” for its abstractions and personal honesty. This source will help me determine whether the fragmented self was inherent of early confessional poetry or if it was later added by future proponents of the genre.

Sexton, Anne. To Bedlam and Part Way Back. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1999. Print.

First book of poems written by Anne Sexton. To Bedlam and Part Way Back deals with mental illness, gender issues, and ultimately renders truths about Sexton through the concept of the fragmented self, which is abstract by nature as proposed by the early poetry of W.D. Snodgrass. This is the main source from which I will argue that there is no connection between the fragmented self and the author.

10/13 My Life Response

October 13th, 2010

” Steedman also helps us to perceive that the mother is not just the primordial subject but also a socially specific subject, who exists beyond the (psychoanalytic) narrative of her loss. The m(OTHER) is not just a metaphor, in other words; she is also a social subject whose difference and specificity needs to be recognized and found a place in our thinking “(Anderson, 114).

“What is the gender on paper. A fatigue in the cold, fear of finishing. And doesn’t it make a difference to me, reading this book now, to know that you are going to read the same book afterwards, in the same copy, these selfsame words-and would that difference made be different if you were reading your own copy of the book at the same time that I was reading mine. It seemed natural to her to confuse the romantic with the motherly” (Hejinian, 76).

The passage from Autobiography explains that the presence of “mother” in feminist autobiographies is not only a metaphorical representation embedded in the existence of the female “I”, but that “mother” is a social construct that serves a social purpose that helps place the author in a given life period. In other words, “mother” gives the author a platform to build social notions of herself as well as as a social perspective. For instance, to write on the death of the mother suggests social complications for the author, the arrangement of the funeral: the ceremonial is social; to lose a mother is to be fully-grown, etc. By  saying that “mother” is not just a metaphor but rather a social subject, Steedman may be suggesting that as any other social subject, ‘mother” has social attributes that the author wants to mirror in her autobiography.

Such is the case in the previously stated passage from My Life, where the anonymous “her” ( could be the author talking in third person, or the reader assumed to be a female) seems to “confuse the romantic with the motherly”. Here, Hejinian ties the “romantic”, which is socially a feminine concern, with the motherly, which, as argued by  Steedman, is a social subject. Thus, a social concern is advocated by a social subject, creating an almost perfect argument. Perhaps, the only way for “her” to not be indifferent to the selfsame words is by confusing the romantic with the motherly, meaning that, if “mother” is a social thus universal subject, anyone can care for the romantic, or the content of someone’s selfsame words, if you parallel it the “mother subject”, whom all readers have been socialized to in one way or another.

10/06 Dictee Post

October 13th, 2010

“You see the color the hue the same you see the shape the form the same you see the unchangeable and the unchanged the same you smell filtered edited through progress and westernization the same you see the numerals and innumerables bonding overlaid the same speech, the same” (Cha 57).

This passage has rhythm, and I found it to be a great example of Cha’s style. This is what grammatically would be called a run-on sentence, also notice that it lacks any punctuation. Reading it out loud for the first time, one becomes nervous about whether or not we’ll have enough breath to finish it, but the words she uses are short and easy to pronounce, allowing us to continue reading while taking small breaths  without even realizing it. This is due to what I would denominate as a rhythmic order, which is attained through repetition, particularly of “the same”, correlating substantives  (i.e.numerals) to its adjectives (i.e. innumerables), using synonyms that have the same amount of syllables (i.e. shape, form), all to convey  feeling.

I felt asphyxiated, bombarded by ideas, rushed to think quickly, to dismiss the past and accept the immediate… This passage is like being inside someone’s head, no, this book in general is like being inside someone’s head, and this passage evidences such theme. I personally enjoyed the poetic presence of this vastly non-prose text. I think that without the rhythm behind every word reading this book would have been tedious to read.

RESEARCH PAPER FREE-WRITING EXERCISE

October 4th, 2010

I would like to research the main theme behind the works of the confessional poet. Even though I will be looking into the poetry of authors like Sylvia Plath, Anne Sexton, etc. I will talk about the confessional poet as a unanimous literary voice. Is there even a main theme present? If so, I will try to narrow it down by looking across several works of confessional poetry as well as the literary criticism these works produced. Wish me luck!

9/29 PERSONAL ESSAYS RESPONSE

September 29th, 2010

“On leaving the theater, we shared a long, uncomfortable silence. Between the movie we’d just seen and the movie about to be made, we both felt awkward and self-conscious, as if we were auditioning for the roles of ourselves” (Sedaris 154).

This passage found in David Sedaris’ Repeat After Me essay explores the idea of the “self” as a protagonist in a  movie. Sedaris is writing about the process of personal writing, which will always come back to the very same struggle: constructing the self. To be a protagonist, a main character, a center piece…are a few ways of looking at what happens to the self in the writing process. Authors like Sedaris may choose to write about others in order to progressively identify,  allocate, or discover what his/her “self” is, or ought to be. In Sedaris’ case, he also chooses to parallel the self with the idea of distant on-looking, as only film-making can deliver.  Why? Maybe because some of us think distance gets us closer to objectivity, which doesn’t necessarily mean that we are in fact being objective.

I believe that Sedaris thinks of life as a movie, and that someone must capture it. I would dare to say that he doesn’t leave his house without pen and paper, though he may often forget his house keys.  Life as a movie… this idea helps when thinking of the self as a protagonist, and also with the so-called objective distance Sedaris aims for through his language choices. I started thinking, don’t movies get edited? Then the veil came down for me, autobiographic authors write, and edit, their lives. It is a consequence of dealing with the self, and its constant reminder of what it’s not, without ever revealing what it truly is.

Authors mean to tell us the truth, which is an issue very much discussed in the first few pages of Autobiography (everybody remembers ‘intentionality’, right?), but this doesn’t necessarily guarantee that what we get is the truth. So why call it non-fiction instead of let’s say, “non-fiction with a hint of fiction”? Sedaris’ essay helps put the “self” in perspective, he treats it as its own actor, separate from the author, one that can be observed with a sense of distance, as opposed to enveloping it around a narrating voice that speaks in first-person. Therefore protecting the author’s integrity, by suggesting slight fallacy on the part of the self.

9/22 LUCKY Response

September 22nd, 2010

“I played histrionic games with Ken and Barbie, where Barbie, by sixteen, had married, given birth, and gotten divorced from Ken. At the mock trial, where the courthouse was made out of poster board I’d cut up, Barbie gave her reason for divorce: Ken didn’t touch (43)”.

This passage, though oblivious to the author’s main story, represents what to me is one of the most recurring themes of Lucky, which is that of “touch” as a consequence of human actions and interactions. Alice, the protagonist, describes herself as being “touched” by the black men she sees on the ride to her sister’s dorm, by the old ladies that come to visit her at home, by the frat boys at her sister’s school, etc. Her mother is described as touching her breasts as part of a “dreaded flap”. When describing her mother’s nervous flaps, there was a sense of obscenity, disgust, disapproval, and embarrassment… the author couldn’t accept it as a medical condition.The rapist evidently touched her physically. She described regular couples in her neighborhood as always touching each other while pointing out that her parents barely did so. There is an obvious concern with describing how people touch each other as well as themselves, and I found this concern very unique to this author.

What does it mean to be touched by others? When reading the autobiography of a rape victim, the idea of being “touched” takes the form of a rape scene, where it gets tainted and from which changed perceptions of the same will derive. It seemed to me that from the rape scene forward, how people “touched” became an important descriptive feature to the author for reasons that could range from being a point of comparison to a self-reminder that every touch represents a kind of rape.

I feel that for the purpose of changing the reader’s mindset of what it means to be “touched”, the author intentionally abandons any romantic notion of touch as being a rather emotional manifestation, even when she means she was emotionally “touched” by something or someone she describes it as a very physical, thus uncomfortable process. This was intentional. Most likely to convince us that to be “touched” is something to be watchful of, if not concerned with: it was an intrusion, a crisis, an unforgivable thing. In the presence of this constant concern, I grew more aware as a reader of a trauma that was invisible in the author’s narrative but was vividly sprouting in the language used.